Implicit in the discussion of internal analysis is the role
that corporate culture plays in the development of strategy. Conceptually, strategy and culture are quite
different as the former is “rational and logical” while the latter is “human, emotional,
and complex” [1]. Despite this, culture
has a drastic impact on strategy as it constitutes “a set of beliefs that drive
employee behavior” implying that a strategy will be unsuccessful if it cannot
align employees towards a common goal based on their expressed beliefs [2]. Looking at some other perspectives provides
some interesting takeaways:
“There's no such
thing as a good or bad culture, just an effective or ineffective one” [2].
“Effective cultures
are not uniform” [3].
Despite the fact that effective strategies are borne of
alignment with culture, this culture is not likely to be uniform, but rather, composed
of many sub-cultures. This largely tends
to occur across different business units; it would be expected that the finance
department would be risk averse to new accounting procedures while the R&D
department would be more willing to take risks in its search for innovation [2].
That said, there are advantages to having a non-uniform culture
within an organization or even within business units. For example, “research shows that diverse
teams outperform more uniform groups” because “diverse groups can bring a
greater variety of approaches and perspectives to a problem” [3]. Further, “excessive uniformity diminishes an
organization’s capacity to adapt” since conformity leads to quashing the
introduction of and action on new ideas [3]. The common denominator is that the
overall business strategy must account for this heterogeneity and focus units
and functions together towards a common strategic purpose in order to be
successful [2].
Leaders need to ask
themselves tough questions.
In order to gauge whether a strategy will be effective,
leaders must first ask themselves whether they truly understand the company’s
culture and whether employees actually believe the expressed statements of this
culture. Doing so will help them understand
where the gaps are between the strategy and culture and allow for action to close
them. [3]
“Effective cultures
do not lean on history” and “are not tied to a business model”.
There is a resounding theme that culture cannot be a
justification for rigid conformity.
Organizations require cultures that while strong, are “able to accept
and adapt to change” [3]. Ultimately, “success
often breeds failure and every business model eventually falters” as
evident in the downfall of Eastman Kodak whose “culture was unable to adapt its
business model” in the wake of sweeping changes in the industry [3].
In conclusion, while it is important for leadership to
understand the coherence of their organizations’ core competencies and
capabilities, it is equally important that they recognize the need for
coherence between their strategy and the culture that will ultimately drive its
execution. If they are not aligned,
leadership must take efforts to either change their organizational culture or
alter their strategy. Or as Torben Rick notes: “A strategy that is at odds with
a company’s culture is doomed. Culture trumps strategy every time” [1].
[1] Rick,
Torben. (7 Jun 2013). What is the Relationship between Corporate
Culture and Strategy? Retrieved 19
Jul 2015 from: http://www.torbenrick.eu/blog/strategy/relationship-between-culture-and-strategy/
[2] Towers
Watson. (Nov 2013). Aligning
Organizational Culture with Business Strategy. Retrieved 19 Jul 2015 from: http://www.towerswatson.com/en-CA/Insights/Newsletters/Global/strategy-at-work/2013/viewpoints-qa-aligning-organizational-culture-with-business-strategy
[3] Satell,
Greg. (18 Jul 2015). Culture
Can Be a Trap – Here’s How to Make it an Asset. Retrieved 19 Jul 2015 from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2015/07/18/culture-can-be-a-trap-heres-how-to-make-it-an-asset/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.