During
this week’s lecture we learned that strategy development is influenced by a
number of factors, externalities and market competitive forces,4 that
help guide organizations not only to understand profitability in the industry
they operate but in the broader context of their mission, goals and objectives.
The focus of this posting is to examine some
examples as an attempt to illustrate how these forces are being played out in
the marketplace.
On example
is the article titled “Cord-Cutters Sap AT&T’s TV
Business” which caught
my attention based on the network effects—demand-side benefits of scale—and the
supply-side economies of scale discussed in Porter’s article.4 So, I
was reminded of how the Telecom Industry and Telcos, including cable companies
and traditional telecom such as Comcast and Verizon and AT&T respectively are
aggressively vying for the same markets and customers.
In this
case, the article talks about how large numbers of customers are abandoning
traditional TV bundles’ services across the industry. It seems the numbers
reported by AT&T are just the tip of the iceberg. AT&T announced that
it had lost around 90,000 customers in the Q3 2017 alone, from customers
switching from its video and satellite pay-services to streaming channels from
content providers via the internet—in part because these online options are
more affordable and cost effective to these customers, the demand side. The
flip side of this market dynamic is that such traditional services are more
profitable for the TV and cable providers, the supply side, than to the latter.
The traditional service fees and prices for TV bundles and such are now above
what customers are willing to pay. And, I’m thinking another key takeaway is that
customer switching costs,4 are no longer a barrier to entry also.
Moreover,
delivering the equivalent video contents online to these customers, is less
profitable to video providers such as AT&T’s DirecTV Now and Dish Network
as well as content providers including Viacom, Disney and AMC and others. The prevalent
business model in the industry is that their revenue is derived, to a
significant extent, from service fees charged on a per subscriber basis. So,
this announcement from AT&T and similar downward trends reported from
Comcast and Charter Communications sent shockwaves through the financial
markets, as this change in consumer behavior could potentially have a
significant impact to their revenue streams and profitability going forward.
Therefore,
I think that this shows how competitive markets and economies of scales and
pricing of services are being shaped in this industry and illustrates the ongoing
fierce competition to ensure customer acquisition and retention as drivers for future
profits.
1.
The Four Global Forces Breaking All the Trends: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-four-global-forces-breaking-all-the-trends,
accessed June 2, 2018.
2.
The Global Forces Inspiring a New Narrative of Progress: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate%20finance/our-insights/the-global-forces-inspiring-a-new-narrative-of-progress,
accessed June 2, 2018.
3.
‘You’re Stupid If You Don’t Get Scared’: When Amazon Goes From
Partner to Rival: https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-amazon-wins-1527845402?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=9,
accessed June 2, 2018.
4.
The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Porter, Harvard
Business Review, January 2008.
5.
Cord-Cutters Sap AT&T’s TV Business: https://www.wsj.com/articles/cord-cutters-sap-at-ts-tv-business-1507809030,
accessed October, 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.