Firstly,
the most common beverage for the majority of the population is not coffee, but tea.
While coffee has managed to find its way around some South Indians, they
generally prefer it to be milky and sugary filtered, which is not how Starbucks
make their coffee. Secondly, there already exists several well-established
local cafés such as Café
Coffee Day, Barista and Costa Café. Not unlike many others, Indians are quite
patriotic towards their own house brands. With these challenges, how should
Starbucks strategize to succeed?
Strategic Agility
The article
mentioned that Strategic Agility is a combination of patience (to wait for the
right time to strike) and boldness (acting when that time arises). Starbucks
has long been trying to enter the Indian market. However, prior to Jan 2012,
India’s Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI) policy forbids
foreign companies to open stores in India unless they partnered (with at most
51% stake) with a local company. What was interesting was that although this
policy was lifted in Jan 2012, Starbucks, instead, announced (in the same
month) a 50-50 joint venture with Tata Group, one of the largest conglomerates
in India by market capitalization and revenue.
Instead of
maximizing profits, Starbucks decided to share them. Yet, after looking deeper
into the issue, this decision seems to have its merits. Being a predominantly
tea-drinking population, Starbucks will need in-depth insights into its core
business plan. Should it continue to focus mainly on coffee, or should it
consider shifting weight to tea-based beverages? In addition, Starbucks has
decided to source its coffee from within India. Working with the local farmers
and distributors who have not had much contact with foreign companies in the
past could prove to be more than just challenging. Hence, playing it safe by partnering
with a local company could ease some of these potentially catastrophic issues.
Portfolio Agility
According to the
article, Portfolio Agility is about resource allocation. It is about shifting
resources out of less promising areas and into more promising ones. For
Starbucks, it is really about one thing: their store menu. Should it be similar
to what is in the US, or should it be more customized to the locals’ tastes? My
take is that it should be the latter. While some of the traditional coffee that
has defined Starbucks (such as Frappuccino and Latte) should remain, new tea-based
additions (besides chai tea) should be added. Some suggestions of Masala Tea,
Alphonso Vivanno Lassi, and even Coconut Water have been made by posts on the
Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post. Whatever it is, Starbucks must not
come across to the locals as a new chain of stores selling radically different
beverages and food. That would make it harder for people to switch from their
local brands.
Operational Agility
The article states
that Operational Agility is about a company being able to exploit both
revenue-enhancing and cost-cutting opportunities within its core business more
quickly, effectively, and consistently than its rivals. The local brands enjoy
low costs as they obtain their raw materials (e.g. coffee beans and tea leaves)
domestically. In addition, labor and production are relatively cheaper in India
than in most parts of the world. For Starbucks to compete, they will need to
eliminate this cost disadvantage by doing likewise. Tata Group would be a good
avenue for Starbucks to look into such aspects.
Based on current
observations, it looks like Starbucks is well on-track to open its first stores
in Delhi and Mumbai in Aug 2012. Having addressed the Strategic and Operational
areas, much now depends on their new store menu.
References:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.