This week a number of our readings addressed aspects of
strategy implementation and focused on different ways to go about enacting a
strategy within a company/group of people. Once all the industry research and
planning is done, it is up to the leaders to get things rolling. In most cases
this comes in the form of organizational change, promoting new visions and
goals, and working to have the right people doing work.
Organizational change is a huge part of implementing strategy
within an organization. Not only because the strategy needs to be disseminated
to all employees and stakeholders, but because any changes put in place or
strategy plans implemented without buy-in will result in tensions and possible
failure. Change is something that almost needs its own strategy and should
focus on: 1) finding a few champions to promote the benefits of change, 2)
giving ample time for people to become comfortable with the changes taking
place, and 3) ensuring that all major stakeholders feel part of the change
process. In Simon Horan and Michael Connerty’s article, Good Strategy Execution Requires Balancing 4 Tensions, some of these
focus areas are highlighted with specific examples. Specifically, their article
highlights the delicate balance of controlling change and implementation of
strategy from a top-down or a more democratic method.
Too often strategy is presented as something that is
developed in a back room and then thrust onto staff and customers as an inevitability.
Without a supporting culture that asks for and benefits from that type of
declarative leadership, even the best strategy is doomed to failure or at least
a very slow and tumultuous launch.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.