The world in which organizations operate is changing at an unprecedented
rate, but some things stand tried and true. The five competitive forces discussed
in Porter’s article are the pillars that need to be analyzed by organizations
and strategist to determine the overall industry’s structure. The McKinsey
Quarterly reports also discuss some forces with central themes around
globalization and accelerating technology advancement that are disruptive and
shaping the future of many industries. However, according to Porter, “industry
structure drives competition and profitability, not whether an industry… is emerging
or…high tech”. And I quite agree.
These “global forces” highlighted in the McKinsey reports are in fact
factors or current trends which may disrupt the way businesses operate and
achieve profitability. These factors do not change the fundamental drivers of industry
competition and profitability. The factors are important no doubt, but are
better viewed as short- to mid-term effects. They should serve only as the lens
with which the five industry competitive forces are viewed and analyzed for
proper industry environment assessment to help reveal an organization’s strengths
and weakness, bring threats to light and help identify opportunities to
leverage; all of which are required for proper strategic positioning.
All industries are impacted by some, if not all of these trends.
Organizations can take solace in this but not for long. It is imperative that these
organizations and their strategists get creative in their strategic positioning
and in exploiting these industry changes. Intuition that worked in the past will
not continue to work in the future. When evaluating industries, strategists
should be careful not to lose sight of the fundamental drivers or levers of
industry profitability in order to properly position themselves.
As my team begins to work on the group project, I am eager
to take these learnings in assessing and evaluating the external strategic
environment and industry dynamics of our selected organization. The first step
would be in defining the industry boundaries for which Amazon has business
stake in. This may prove to be a challenge to define precisely, given the diversity
of Amazon’s portfolio and their extensive ecosystem cutting across value chains.
But with Porter’s recommendation of using the scope of an organization’s products
and services, and geographic span, in combination with analysis of the
competitive forces, we will be able to identify Amazon’s industries and associated
competitors. Another interesting insight would be to analyze how Amazon has
used past trends to grow. From there, we can deduce their strategic positioning
for the future. Already, it is evident that Amazon has used technology to
optimize the use of resources and to build “horizontal platforms” to reduce the
power of suppliers, buyers, rivalry among competition, threat of substitutes, increase
the threat to new entrants, and grow into the giant it is today.
Sources:
Porter, M.E. The
Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy: Harvard Business Review, January
2008.
Dobbs R., Manyika
J.& Woetzel J. The Four Global Forces Breaking All the Trends: McKinsey
Quarterly Report, April 2015
Greenberg, E.,
Hirt M. & Smit S. The Global Forces Inspiring a New Narrative of Progress: McKinsey
Quarterly Report, April 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.