The article Creating Shared
Value not only introduces the concept of shared value, but also
demonstrates the difference between CSR
(Corporate Social Responsibility) and CSV
(Creating Shared Value). In China, CSV is still a new concept and few companies
has put this concept into practice.
Most enterprises still focus on developing CSR strategy. Learning to change their tracks to CSV helps Chinese enterprises
to increase both economic profits and social benefits, which will be
an important step for them to gain competitive advantage in the market and expand their
business around the globe.
Here, I want to illustrate the difference between CSV and CSR by two examples and
show how Chinese company can learn from the mature practice of CSV.
In China, the companies doing well in creating shared value are
all foreign capital enterprises such as Nestle, Microsoft and Cisco. Take Nestle
China as an example. Nestle china’s sustainable coffee growing in Yunnan is a
perfect practice in creating shared value. Nestle dedicated itself to create win-win situation in which local
customers, suppliers, employees as well as local government all got benefits. Nestle
invited foreign experts and gardeners to Yunnan to help
local farmers build coffee industry chain. It was hard to teach local farmers
who has few experiences in coffee growing.
Nestle offered training to farmers and
also taught them how to limit water usage in irrigation. Although Nestle’s
effort in creating shared value led to losses in a quite long time, they got
great rewards eventually. Nestle ensured its coffee beans conform to its global quality standard.
Also, by procuring raw material locally and removing the existence of
middleman, Nestle successfully saved large amount of costs. Nestle China also established
trust with local farmers since Nestle’s practice successfully raised their
income. Nestle’s efforts in creating
shared value contributed to both the
development of local communities and local environment as well
as ensure Nestle China’s sustainable
growing business.
Nestle China demonstrated the power of shared value. Shared value is about creating value
for both business and community, which is integral to profit maximization and
gain competitive advantage.
As the article Creating Shared
Value says, there are three ways to create share value. First is to
reconceiving products and markets. The second is to redefine productivity in
value chain. The third is to enable local cluster development. Nestle China‘s
approaches to create shared value mainly focused on the second and third way which
can be learnt from similar food and beverage companies in China. As
mentioned before, for now, Chinese enterprises still focus on the strategy of CSR. It is time to switch the
track of CSV. Take Eili, a leading Chinese company in dairy products industry, as an example. Its strategic goal
is to build world shared heath. However, the model of Eli remains in the scope
of CSR instead of CSV. It invests large amounts of money every year to
execute its program in Corporate Social Responsibility such as protecting
environment and biodiversity, but these programs are not related to its main
business. Philanthropy gains Eili reputation and has become a way of building brand. However,
CSR separates doing good from profit maximization of business. What Eili can
learn from Nestle China is to upgrade their model of CSR to the stage of CSV. For
example, it can bring advanced technology
to livestock farmers in order
to raise productivity and gain high quality milk. They can
provide training for local farmers to use those advanced technology to raise livestock.
Technology helps to reduce livestock’s over-exploitation of plantation on the prairie. A more sustainable way to raise livestock will help Eili secure sustainable source of high quality milk. In the meanwhile,
solving the employment of local communities, raising those farmers‘ income and preventing
further damage to the environment are huge societal values Eili brings. Through
this way, there is no trade-off between societal values and economic benefits.
In conclusion, there is a big difference in CSR and CSV. Facing the
pressing social issues, it is time for Chinese companies to deal with the challenges
by creating shared value.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.