This week’s readings illustrated the importance of considering
all benefits and costs associated with doing business, and reminded us that
many apparent externalities represent real internal costs to businesses,
insofar as the same inefficiencies that cause social harm may also often lead
to economic waste and loss. The article “Creating Shared Value” goes further,
to suggest that private enterprise is actually better than governments or non-profit
organizations at delivering social value, particularly if they are able to
transcend the traditional approaches that positon social value as a cost that
reduces business value, and that typically view social value as something to be
delivered via mere compliance or charity (whether via donation or through the
application of organizational time and expertise). Our examination of ITC, and
its decision regarding entry into the dairy market, provides an excellent
example of a company that has succeeded in its social mission through careful
planning and rigorous management, in order to operationalize opportunities to
deliver value to their shareholders, to its nation, and to the local communities
where they do business.
To create shared value, companies can reconceive their
products and markets, based on constantly evolving social and business needs
and opportunities. By doing so, organizations are able to deliver new products
into new and existing markets, particularly those that have been previously
underserved. In one example, Thomson Reuters was able to increase farm incomes of
60% of participants, in some cases tripling incomes. Companies may also
redefine productivity in the value chain, improving efficiency and delivering
economic and social benefits to stakeholders. For example, Walmart was able to
save $200 million by reducing packaging and rerouting trucks; it is intuitive
that shipping goods across long distances adds both economic cost (in terms of
freight costs, fuel, etc.) and environmental costs (in the form of higher emissions,
etc.). Finally businesses can enable local cluster development, which creates
value by promoting the development of capable local suppliers and supporting
businesses and industry, as well as promoting a larger customer base into which
additional goods can be sold.
Ultimately, the shared value model is one that promotes
innovation, in that it requires companies to look holistically at their
business and improve efficiency and effectiveness in terms of their ability to
deliver products into markets, achieve greater efficiency in the value chain,
and develop business clusters in the communities where they do business. As we
have seen, suppliers and customers in disruptive environments discover new
markets together, as evidenced by the extent to which ITC embraced the promise
of e-Choupal when it was very much an unproven idea, and invested early in its
success. Therefore, the concept of creating shared value is highly compatible
with the innovative work that must be done to thrive in disruptive environments.
By exploring opportunities to leverage organization capabilities in service of
new market opportunities, businesses can improve their operational efficiency
while delivering value to the communities in which they operate.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.