Sunday, September 29, 2019

Blog#4: Taking Strategy from Development to Implementation


Taking Strategy from Development to Implementation

The correct time to assess your strategy is NOW! “Rather than looking for the next musing, it’s probably better to be thorough about what we know is true and make sure we do that well”, said Phil Rosenzweig, a professor at IMD on being asked, “What’s the next new thing in strategy?”.[1]

The above line is well said as the strategy cannot be formulated to a framework of rules and procedures. A strategy is generally idiosyncratic to their organization, people and markets. Also, many strategies emerge over time rather than from a process of deliberate formulation. [2]

However, strategists also need to take care of the emerging trends that affect the business. Chris, Martin and Sven tell us that, there are ten tests on their list, and not all are created equal. The first— “will it beat the market?”—is comprehensive. The remaining nine disaggregate the picture of a market-beating strategy, though it’s certainly possible for a strategy to succeed without “passing” all nine of them.

Two of the nine tests – Test 4 talks about “Does your strategy put you ahead of trends?”, and “Test 6: Does your strategy embrace uncertainty?”[1]

As the article states, many strategies place too much weight on the continuation of the status quo because they extrapolate from the past three to five years, a time frame too brief to capture the true violence of market forces.[1] Unwillingness to cannibalize a legacy business or an attachment to yesterday’s formula for success shook the real-time industry of Blockbuster. Netflix crushed the market with a new trend. Blockbuster’s company spokesperson said, "We have every reason to believe we will come out of the recapitalization process financially stronger and more competitively positioned for the future." It doesn't look like things have gone according to plan. Although Blockbuster began a rentals-by-mail and streaming service belatedly to fight against competitors like Netflix, they didn't come on strong enough or soon enough. It was a battle between old technology and new technology, and it looks like new technology won out in the end. One of the most interesting stats on the infographic is the fact that "Back in 2000, Blockbuster declined several offers to purchase Netflix for a mere $50 million." The offer was not too shabby for a company that was, at the time, bringing in billions of dollars in revenue. Blockbuster is certainly hitting themselves for not jumping at the offer, which may have seemed irrelevant and unimportant at the time.[3] Blockbuster's strategy neither put Blockbuster ahead of the trend nor embraced the uncertainty. 

Thus, we see how emerging technology can transition a well set up industry. “We can say that technology by itself is not the disruptor. Customer centricity is. Amazon did not kill retailers. Convenience and better range did.” – Mad Over Marketing





[2] For a classic statement of the idea that strategies are more emergent than planned, see Henry Mintzberg, “Crafting Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, 1987, July–August, Volume 65, Number 4, pp. 66–75.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.