For the last 15 years I have worked for professional associations
and non-profits. The words "strategic plan" are thrown around with
almost reckless abandon whenever committees, working groups, and board members
get together. Despite the familiarity with the term, very few of these
professionals seem to understand the purpose and driving force of developing a
strategic plan.
In most cases, association
strategic plans consist of a few key elements that are strategy adjacent -
mission statement, vision statement, list of far-reaching goals, etc. However,
the strategy aspects of the plan often fall short.
As associations live and die by membership, their strategic plans
likely center around operational aspirations to indefinitely expand membership
reach or somehow diversify membership. Very few strategic plans I have seen
over my time has ever dealt with the ideas of competition from other
associations or services. Even fewer address aspects of leveraging customers
(members being a form of customer). The result is often a strategic plan that
contains no driving force to push for a better association, nor does it prepare
for the possibility of weakening relevance within their specific field.
Michael Porter’s The Five
Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy not only identifies the key elements
that most associations do not focus on (New Entrants, Buyer Power, Supplier
Power, Substitute Services, and Existing Competitors), but really identifies
one key aspect that I feel is missing from association planning – Industry Analysis. As associations intrinsically
serve a specific audience that is often so narrowly focused as to prevent
competitors (for example, I strongly doubt there is much competition to the Association
for Pet Loss and Bereavement or the Association of Camp Nurses). As result of
this narrow focus from the start, competition and an understanding of the
supporting industry is often overlooked or made secondary to strategic goals of
expanding reach.
Without true industry analysis, many of these associations lack an
understanding of the scale and depth of the audience they look to serve. Porter
talks about a few specific steps to industry analysis that I think are key for
all associations:
·
Understanding the appropriate time horizon
for an industry. An
understanding of long-term trends vs cyclical changes is paramount to
determining if the demand to start an association is even warranted.
·
Understand the underpinnings of
competition and root cause of profitability. Again, this basic understanding is key to determining that
overall scale the association could ever expect to reach. If a professional
only has 2,000 people in the United States that practice that specific career,
a strategic plan to grow membership beyond that number would require an
understanding of draw to alternative careers or professionals.
·
Understand the available money within the
industry. Making a strategic
plan that focuses on products and services is beneficial, but if the customer
base that it would serve is known to be cash limited or traditionally frugal,
the association is setting themselves up for failure.
·
Understand the entire industry. This last point is likely the most relevant
to my concerns with association strategy. As stated, associations focus
narrowly to identify niche areas of support. However, there is often very
little focus on the broader associations that also serve their members and may
offer similar or supporting services and products in a better or more inclusive
manner.
Both associations and non-profits tend to promote strategic plans
as far-reaching and unattainable plans. If, however there was some underlying analysis
of the supported/supporting industries, the result would be a more useful roadmap
and attainable future.
Industry Analysis information summarized from "The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy," by Michael E. Porter, published in 2007 by Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.