Before attending Heinz, I worked at a community foundation.
These types of foundations are driven by a conglomeration of individual
donations and the creation of various funds, unlike many typical foundations where
inception is based on a single family’s or individual’s wealth. The foundation gives
grants at the staff’s discretion, but also by the donor who create funds
through it. This organization was a great place to be, though strategy never
seemed to be the strong suit of the management staff there. There were many
communication gaps, and though it seemed to be inclusive with our annual
all-staff retreat, what seemed to propagate most was work that never became
realized.
After the readings, I think I would classify the foundation
in the Shaping category, unpredictable but able to change (even if slowly). We
would never have control over the amount of money people inherit, people give charitably,
and people choose to pay a 2% fee for service over Fidelity’s low rates and
limited customer contact and expertise, but we could get our name out there and
be a model for the work in the state. I think that is one thing that management
staff realized and tried to push, and actually did in some cases. The
organization was a leader in impact investing for quite some time, and has
provided as an interesting model for engaging individual donors in local business
endeavors. Looking back, this has actually been what I view as one of the main
accomplishments of the organization, while the time we exerted into planning,
retreats, and staff meetings fade into the background. Oddly enough, perhaps
because this strategy happened by accident or emerged more naturally, we did
not capitalize on how different that made us and how much that contact with the
emerging business community may have appealed to donors. Also, after hurricane
Irene, there was an extreme effort from the staff to push for increased
grantmaking to hurt communities. I don’t know if it was the endless intent to be
groundbreaking, continue doing work better, invest more money, or whatever may
have fueled ideas and meetings with quiet and fizzled endings, but at least a
couple times that strategy discussions seemed to prime staff members for
real-time strategic decision-making.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.