When I was working at for-profit company, I always
felt uncomfortable with the “capitalist” atmosphere. The company and my bosses
just focused on profit and there was no time to think about social responsibility.
Moreover, they sometimes took me out from organizational integrity for profits.
This company culture reduces employees’ motivation and loyalty, and deteriorates
its reputation. The concept of shared value has a possibility to change this organizational
culture.
On the other hand, non-profit companies also have problems;
one of the most serious problems is its sustainability. Non-profit companies
tend to pursue its mission without sustainable strategy, especially tiny
non-profits. My non-profit company was no exception, as a result, the non-profit
was always in financial crisis and it was not able to fix it. Recently, however,
non-profits have begun to adopt business management style for sustainability and
those activities create new economic markets. Basically, the blurring of the
boundaries between success for-profits and non-profits is certainly evident.
From my own experience, I think accepted business
style by non-profits is easily than adopted the concept of shared value by
for-profits. Adopting business style is essential for non-profits to think
about their sustainability. However, for-profit companies who have to invest
their money to conduct shared value operations. It is hard for-profits
companies to purely focus on such a belief, especially in this severe economic
situation. In short, cost performance measures are significant key factors to
adopt the concept of shared value or not.
A successful company can afford to invest shared value
and this investment might strengthen its reputation. But how do other companies
follow suit? This might be one of the watersheds between for-profits and
non-profits.
[i] Michael
E. Porter, Mark R. Kramer. "Creating Shared Value" Harvard Business Review February 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.